Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
At common law, when a frustrating event occurs, the contract is terminated at the date of the frustrating event, irrespective of the wishes of the parties. Consequently, rights which accrued before the frustrating event are enforceable, but no liability arises for obligations that would otherwise have accrued after the frustrating event took place. The operation of the rules at common law is perfectly illustrated by looking again at the 'Coronation Cases' Krell v Henry and [case].
Answer
Chandler v Webster

Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
At common law, when a frustrating event occurs, the contract is terminated at the date of the frustrating event, irrespective of the wishes of the parties. Consequently, rights which accrued before the frustrating event are enforceable, but no liability arises for obligations that would otherwise have accrued after the frustrating event took place. The operation of the rules at common law is perfectly illustrated by looking again at the 'Coronation Cases' Krell v Henry and [case].
Answer
?

Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
At common law, when a frustrating event occurs, the contract is terminated at the date of the frustrating event, irrespective of the wishes of the parties. Consequently, rights which accrued before the frustrating event are enforceable, but no liability arises for obligations that would otherwise have accrued after the frustrating event took place. The operation of the rules at common law is perfectly illustrated by looking again at the 'Coronation Cases' Krell v Henry and [case].
Answer
Chandler v Webster
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
ut no liability arises for obligations that would otherwise have accrued after the frustrating event took place. The operation of the rules at common law is perfectly illustrated by looking again at the 'Coronation Cases' Krell v Henry and <span>Chandler v Webster.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.