Where the benefit conferred before the frustrating event occurs is a non-monetary benefit, the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 s 1(3) may be of some assistance. It provides that a party who has gained a valuable benefit under the contract before the frustrating event, [...]. The task for the court when applying this subsection is, first, to identify and value the benefit conferred, and then, second, to make an assessment of the just sum that should be awarded. The amount awarded cannot exceed the value of the benefit obtained. Provided the court does not award more than this amount, the court may award whatever sum is just having regard to all the circumstances of the case and, in particular s 1(3)(a) and (b).
Answer
may be required to pay a just sum for it
Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
Where the benefit conferred before the frustrating event occurs is a non-monetary benefit, the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 s 1(3) may be of some assistance. It provides that a party who has gained a valuable benefit under the contract before the frustrating event, [...]. The task for the court when applying this subsection is, first, to identify and value the benefit conferred, and then, second, to make an assessment of the just sum that should be awarded. The amount awarded cannot exceed the value of the benefit obtained. Provided the court does not award more than this amount, the court may award whatever sum is just having regard to all the circumstances of the case and, in particular s 1(3)(a) and (b).
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
Where the benefit conferred before the frustrating event occurs is a non-monetary benefit, the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 s 1(3) may be of some assistance. It provides that a party who has gained a valuable benefit under the contract before the frustrating event, [...]. The task for the court when applying this subsection is, first, to identify and value the benefit conferred, and then, second, to make an assessment of the just sum that should be awarded. The amount awarded cannot exceed the value of the benefit obtained. Provided the court does not award more than this amount, the court may award whatever sum is just having regard to all the circumstances of the case and, in particular s 1(3)(a) and (b).
Answer
may be required to pay a just sum for it
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it rustrating event occurs is a non-monetary benefit, the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 s 1(3) may be of some assistance. It provides that a party who has gained a valuable benefit under the contract before the frustrating event, <span>may be required to pay a just sum for it. The task for the court when applying this subsection is, first, to identify and value the benefit conferred, and then, second, to make an assessment of the just sum that should be aw
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.