The courts have not allowed the defence of frustration to be used by a party trying to escape from a contract because of an unexpected event which is to their disadvantage. This can be seen by the next case, [case].
Answer
Amalgamated Investment and Property Co Ltd v John Walker & Sons Ltd [1976] 3 All ER 509
Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
The courts have not allowed the defence of frustration to be used by a party trying to escape from a contract because of an unexpected event which is to their disadvantage. This can be seen by the next case, [case].
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
The courts have not allowed the defence of frustration to be used by a party trying to escape from a contract because of an unexpected event which is to their disadvantage. This can be seen by the next case, [case].
Answer
Amalgamated Investment and Property Co Ltd v John Walker & Sons Ltd [1976] 3 All ER 509
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it tml>The courts have not allowed the defence of frustration to be used by a party trying to escape from a contract because of an unexpected event which is to their disadvantage. This can be seen by the next case, Amalgamated Investment and Property Co Ltd v John Walker & Sons Ltd [1976] 3 All ER 509.<html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.