Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
Impossibility can also apply where the frustrating event destroys an asset that does not form the subject matter of the contract in question, but rather is essential for the performance of the contract. For example, in [case], a contract to install and maintain machinery in a factory was frustrated when the factory was destroyed by fire. The factory was not the subject matter of the contract, but was nevertheless essential to its performance.
Answer
Appleby v Myers (1867) LR 2 CP 651

Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
Impossibility can also apply where the frustrating event destroys an asset that does not form the subject matter of the contract in question, but rather is essential for the performance of the contract. For example, in [case], a contract to install and maintain machinery in a factory was frustrated when the factory was destroyed by fire. The factory was not the subject matter of the contract, but was nevertheless essential to its performance.
Answer
?

Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
Impossibility can also apply where the frustrating event destroys an asset that does not form the subject matter of the contract in question, but rather is essential for the performance of the contract. For example, in [case], a contract to install and maintain machinery in a factory was frustrated when the factory was destroyed by fire. The factory was not the subject matter of the contract, but was nevertheless essential to its performance.
Answer
Appleby v Myers (1867) LR 2 CP 651
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
ad>Impossibility can also apply where the frustrating event destroys an asset that does not form the subject matter of the contract in question, but rather is essential for the performance of the contract. For example, in Appleby v Myers (1867) LR 2 CP 651, a contract to install and maintain machinery in a factory was frustrated when the factory was destroyed by fire. The factory was not the subject matter of the contract, but was never

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.