In Dick Kerr and Co v Metropolitan Water Board [1918] AC 119, contractors agreed to construct a reservoir in six years. The contract provided that, in the event of delay, 'whatsoever and howsoever occasioned', the contractors were to apply to the engineer for an extension of time. When the contractors were required by a government order to stop the work and sell their plant, it was held that the [...]because the delay clause was not intended to apply to such a fundamental change of circumstances. It was held that the clause was intended to cover only temporary difficulties and did not cover fundamental changes in the nature of the contract.
Answer
contract was frustrated
Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
In Dick Kerr and Co v Metropolitan Water Board [1918] AC 119, contractors agreed to construct a reservoir in six years. The contract provided that, in the event of delay, 'whatsoever and howsoever occasioned', the contractors were to apply to the engineer for an extension of time. When the contractors were required by a government order to stop the work and sell their plant, it was held that the [...]because the delay clause was not intended to apply to such a fundamental change of circumstances. It was held that the clause was intended to cover only temporary difficulties and did not cover fundamental changes in the nature of the contract.
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
In Dick Kerr and Co v Metropolitan Water Board [1918] AC 119, contractors agreed to construct a reservoir in six years. The contract provided that, in the event of delay, 'whatsoever and howsoever occasioned', the contractors were to apply to the engineer for an extension of time. When the contractors were required by a government order to stop the work and sell their plant, it was held that the [...]because the delay clause was not intended to apply to such a fundamental change of circumstances. It was held that the clause was intended to cover only temporary difficulties and did not cover fundamental changes in the nature of the contract.
Answer
contract was frustrated
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it t of delay, 'whatsoever and howsoever occasioned', the contractors were to apply to the engineer for an extension of time. When the contractors were required by a government order to stop the work and sell their plant, it was held that the <span>contract was frustrated because the delay clause was not intended to apply to such a fundamental change of circumstances. It was held that the clause was intended to cover only temporary difficulties and did
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.