Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
Now consider the leading case on the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 s 1(2): [case]. Mr Justice Garland's, decision was unsurprising for its conventional approach to the burden of proof, stating that it lies with the payee (that is, the party seeking to retain or recover their expenses from the sum of money paid or payable in advance) to show that it is 'just' for him so to do. On the subject of apportionment, he considered alternative approaches, but concluded that the court has a 'broad discretion'.
Answer
Gamerco SA v ICM/Fair Warning (Agency) Ltd [1995] 1 WLR 1226

Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
Now consider the leading case on the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 s 1(2): [case]. Mr Justice Garland's, decision was unsurprising for its conventional approach to the burden of proof, stating that it lies with the payee (that is, the party seeking to retain or recover their expenses from the sum of money paid or payable in advance) to show that it is 'just' for him so to do. On the subject of apportionment, he considered alternative approaches, but concluded that the court has a 'broad discretion'.
Answer
?

Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
Now consider the leading case on the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 s 1(2): [case]. Mr Justice Garland's, decision was unsurprising for its conventional approach to the burden of proof, stating that it lies with the payee (that is, the party seeking to retain or recover their expenses from the sum of money paid or payable in advance) to show that it is 'just' for him so to do. On the subject of apportionment, he considered alternative approaches, but concluded that the court has a 'broad discretion'.
Answer
Gamerco SA v ICM/Fair Warning (Agency) Ltd [1995] 1 WLR 1226
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
Now consider the leading case on the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 s 1(2): Gamerco SA v ICM/Fair Warning (Agency) Ltd [1995] 1 WLR 1226. Mr Justice Garland's, decision was unsurprising for its conventional approach to the burden of proof, stating that it lies with the payee (that is, the party seeking to retain or rec

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.