Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
R v Servite Houses & London Borough of Wandsworth, ex parte Goldsmith [2001] LGR 55 and [case] both concerned contracting-out provisions.
Answer
R (on the application of A) v Partnerships In Care [2002] EWHC (Admin) 529

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
R v Servite Houses & London Borough of Wandsworth, ex parte Goldsmith [2001] LGR 55 and [case] both concerned contracting-out provisions.
Answer
?

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
R v Servite Houses & London Borough of Wandsworth, ex parte Goldsmith [2001] LGR 55 and [case] both concerned contracting-out provisions.
Answer
R (on the application of A) v Partnerships In Care [2002] EWHC (Admin) 529
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
R v Servite Houses & London Borough of Wandsworth, ex parte Goldsmith [2001] LGR 55 and R (on the application of A) v Partnerships In Care [2002] EWHC (Admin) 529 both concerned contracting-out provisions.

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.