Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
R v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex parte Rose Theatre Trust Co Ltd [1990] 1 QB 504.
Answer

The Rose Theatre Trust Co Ltd was formed to act as an interest group, campaigning to have an archaeological site 'listed' and protected by the government as an ancient monument. The relevant minister had refused to do so. The group consisted of people with expertise in archaeology, the theatre, literature, and other fields, and also included local councillors and an MP. Schiemann J distilled eight propositions from the Fleet Street Casuals case and held that an individual will only have standing if the statute gives the individual, expressly or impliedly, a greater right or expectation than any other citizen to have that decision taken lawfully. None of the members of the company had this in his view. Individuals who did not have standing would not gain it just because they formed themselves into a group or a company. Therefore, the company was not given standing to challenge the minister's refusal to grant the listing.

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
R v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex parte Rose Theatre Trust Co Ltd [1990] 1 QB 504.
Answer
?

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
R v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex parte Rose Theatre Trust Co Ltd [1990] 1 QB 504.
Answer

The Rose Theatre Trust Co Ltd was formed to act as an interest group, campaigning to have an archaeological site 'listed' and protected by the government as an ancient monument. The relevant minister had refused to do so. The group consisted of people with expertise in archaeology, the theatre, literature, and other fields, and also included local councillors and an MP. Schiemann J distilled eight propositions from the Fleet Street Casuals case and held that an individual will only have standing if the statute gives the individual, expressly or impliedly, a greater right or expectation than any other citizen to have that decision taken lawfully. None of the members of the company had this in his view. Individuals who did not have standing would not gain it just because they formed themselves into a group or a company. Therefore, the company was not given standing to challenge the minister's refusal to grant the listing.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
R v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex parte Rose Theatre Trust Co Ltd [1990] 1 QB 504. The Rose Theatre Trust Co Ltd was formed to act as an interest group, campaigning to have an archaeological site 'listed' and protected by the government as an ancient monument. The rele

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.