Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
judicial review is concerned with checking the exercise of public power. From a constitutional perspective, the courts should not be concerned with the merits of a decision, but rather with whether [...]. It is very important to appreciate that judicial review is not the same as appeal. The courts do not substitute their own decision for that of the decision-maker but can direct, for example, that the decision be made again in the correct manner. However, in certain cases, the findings of the judges arguably do come close to a criticism of the actual substantive merits of the decision under scrutiny.
Answer
such a decision has been correctly made according to law

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
judicial review is concerned with checking the exercise of public power. From a constitutional perspective, the courts should not be concerned with the merits of a decision, but rather with whether [...]. It is very important to appreciate that judicial review is not the same as appeal. The courts do not substitute their own decision for that of the decision-maker but can direct, for example, that the decision be made again in the correct manner. However, in certain cases, the findings of the judges arguably do come close to a criticism of the actual substantive merits of the decision under scrutiny.
Answer
?

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
judicial review is concerned with checking the exercise of public power. From a constitutional perspective, the courts should not be concerned with the merits of a decision, but rather with whether [...]. It is very important to appreciate that judicial review is not the same as appeal. The courts do not substitute their own decision for that of the decision-maker but can direct, for example, that the decision be made again in the correct manner. However, in certain cases, the findings of the judges arguably do come close to a criticism of the actual substantive merits of the decision under scrutiny.
Answer
such a decision has been correctly made according to law
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
judicial review is concerned with checking the exercise of public power. From a constitutional perspective, the courts should not be concerned with the merits of a decision, but rather with whether such a decision has been correctly made according to law. It is very important to appreciate that judicial review is not the same as appeal. The courts do not substitute their own decision for that of the decision-maker but can direct, for

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.