However, some regulatory authorities have proved more problematic. In [case], even though the F.A. appeared to be carrying out a public function (and it also exercised a monopoly in which membership was compulsory), it was deemed not to be subject to judicial review.
Answer
R v Football Association, ex parte Football League [1993] 2 All ER 833
Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
However, some regulatory authorities have proved more problematic. In [case], even though the F.A. appeared to be carrying out a public function (and it also exercised a monopoly in which membership was compulsory), it was deemed not to be subject to judicial review.
Answer
?
Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
However, some regulatory authorities have proved more problematic. In [case], even though the F.A. appeared to be carrying out a public function (and it also exercised a monopoly in which membership was compulsory), it was deemed not to be subject to judicial review.
Answer
R v Football Association, ex parte Football League [1993] 2 All ER 833
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it However, some regulatory authorities have proved more problematic. In R v Football Association, ex parte Football League [1993] 2 All ER 833, even though the F.A. appeared to be carrying out a public function (and it also exercised a monopoly in which membership was compulsory), it was deemed not to be subject to judicial
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.