Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
One of the most important decisions in this area is [case]. Dr Roy was a GP carrying out work for the NHS. Payment for his services was provided for under statutory regulations. The FPC was entitled to reduce the amount of payment if they considered that a GP was not devoting a substantial amount of time to his NHS work. The FPC took the view that Dr Roy was not doing so and therefore reduced his practice allowance by 20 percent. Dr Roy brought a private action against the FPC claiming inter alia that the Committee was in breach of contract. The FPC applied to strike out his claim as an abuse of process. According to the FPC, the correct procedure for challenging their decision was by way of an application for judicial review.
Answer
Roy v Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Family Practitioner Committee (FPC) [1992] 1 AC 624

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
One of the most important decisions in this area is [case]. Dr Roy was a GP carrying out work for the NHS. Payment for his services was provided for under statutory regulations. The FPC was entitled to reduce the amount of payment if they considered that a GP was not devoting a substantial amount of time to his NHS work. The FPC took the view that Dr Roy was not doing so and therefore reduced his practice allowance by 20 percent. Dr Roy brought a private action against the FPC claiming inter alia that the Committee was in breach of contract. The FPC applied to strike out his claim as an abuse of process. According to the FPC, the correct procedure for challenging their decision was by way of an application for judicial review.
Answer
?

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
One of the most important decisions in this area is [case]. Dr Roy was a GP carrying out work for the NHS. Payment for his services was provided for under statutory regulations. The FPC was entitled to reduce the amount of payment if they considered that a GP was not devoting a substantial amount of time to his NHS work. The FPC took the view that Dr Roy was not doing so and therefore reduced his practice allowance by 20 percent. Dr Roy brought a private action against the FPC claiming inter alia that the Committee was in breach of contract. The FPC applied to strike out his claim as an abuse of process. According to the FPC, the correct procedure for challenging their decision was by way of an application for judicial review.
Answer
Roy v Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Family Practitioner Committee (FPC) [1992] 1 AC 624
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
One of the most important decisions in this area is Roy v Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Family Practitioner Committee (FPC) [1992] 1 AC 624. Dr Roy was a GP carrying out work for the NHS. Payment for his services was provided for under statutory regulations. The FPC was entitled to reduce the amount of payment if they co

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.