James McNaughton Paper Group Ltd v Hicks Anderson [1991] All ER 134
Answer
Another case concerning advice given by auditors, this time in respect of a company take-over. The advisees were carrying out the take-over and it was held that, as they were experienced business people, it was not reasonable for them to have relied solely on the draft accounts prepared by the defendants. They should have obtained independent advice.
Tags
#law #negligence #pel #tort
Question
James McNaughton Paper Group Ltd v Hicks Anderson [1991] All ER 134
Answer
?
Tags
#law #negligence #pel #tort
Question
James McNaughton Paper Group Ltd v Hicks Anderson [1991] All ER 134
Answer
Another case concerning advice given by auditors, this time in respect of a company take-over. The advisees were carrying out the take-over and it was held that, as they were experienced business people, it was not reasonable for them to have relied solely on the draft accounts prepared by the defendants. They should have obtained independent advice.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it James McNaughton Paper Group Ltd v Hicks Anderson [1991] All ER 134 was another case concerning advice given by auditors, this time in respect of a company take-over. The advisees were carrying out the take-over and it was held that, as they were expe
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.