However, in Mansfield v Weetabix Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 1263 the Court of Appeal adopted an alternative view. Here a lorry driver crashed his vehicle into the claimant’s shop after suffering a hypoglycaemic state. There was no evidence that the driver knew that his ability to drive was impaired. The Court of Appeal held that [...]. The driver was thus found not liable.
Answer
the defendant should be judged in comparison with a reasonably competent driver who is unaware that he is suffering a condition that impairs his ability to drive
Tags
#breach #negligence #tort
Question
However, in Mansfield v Weetabix Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 1263 the Court of Appeal adopted an alternative view. Here a lorry driver crashed his vehicle into the claimant’s shop after suffering a hypoglycaemic state. There was no evidence that the driver knew that his ability to drive was impaired. The Court of Appeal held that [...]. The driver was thus found not liable.
Answer
?
Tags
#breach #negligence #tort
Question
However, in Mansfield v Weetabix Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 1263 the Court of Appeal adopted an alternative view. Here a lorry driver crashed his vehicle into the claimant’s shop after suffering a hypoglycaemic state. There was no evidence that the driver knew that his ability to drive was impaired. The Court of Appeal held that [...]. The driver was thus found not liable.
Answer
the defendant should be judged in comparison with a reasonably competent driver who is unaware that he is suffering a condition that impairs his ability to drive
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it d an alternative view. Here a lorry driver crashed his vehicle into the claimant’s shop after suffering a hypoglycaemic state. There was no evidence that the driver knew that his ability to drive was impaired. The Court of Appeal held that <span>the defendant should be judged in comparison with a reasonably competent driver who is unaware that he is suffering a condition that impairs his ability to drive. The driver was thus found not liable.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.