It should not, however, be assumed a doctor always owes a duty of care. For example, if a doctor provides advice for an occupational health report, there is no direct doctor-patient relationship and a duty to prevent economic loss does not exist. See [case].
Answer
Kapfunde v Abbey National plc (1998) 46 BMLR 176
Tags
#clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
It should not, however, be assumed a doctor always owes a duty of care. For example, if a doctor provides advice for an occupational health report, there is no direct doctor-patient relationship and a duty to prevent economic loss does not exist. See [case].
Answer
?
Tags
#clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
It should not, however, be assumed a doctor always owes a duty of care. For example, if a doctor provides advice for an occupational health report, there is no direct doctor-patient relationship and a duty to prevent economic loss does not exist. See [case].
Answer
Kapfunde v Abbey National plc (1998) 46 BMLR 176
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it d not, however, be assumed a doctor always owes a duty of care. For example, if a doctor provides advice for an occupational health report, there is no direct doctor-patient relationship and a duty to prevent economic loss does not exist. See <span>Kapfunde v Abbey National plc (1998) 46 BMLR 176.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.