It should not, however, be assumed a doctor always owes a duty of care. For example, if a doctor [...], there is no direct doctor-patient relationship and a duty to prevent economic loss does not exist. See Kapfunde v Abbey National plc (1998) 46 BMLR 176.
Answer
provides advice for an occupational health report
Tags
#clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
It should not, however, be assumed a doctor always owes a duty of care. For example, if a doctor [...], there is no direct doctor-patient relationship and a duty to prevent economic loss does not exist. See Kapfunde v Abbey National plc (1998) 46 BMLR 176.
Answer
?
Tags
#clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
It should not, however, be assumed a doctor always owes a duty of care. For example, if a doctor [...], there is no direct doctor-patient relationship and a duty to prevent economic loss does not exist. See Kapfunde v Abbey National plc (1998) 46 BMLR 176.
Answer
provides advice for an occupational health report
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it It should not, however, be assumed a doctor always owes a duty of care. For example, if a doctor provides advice for an occupational health report, there is no direct doctor-patient relationship and a duty to prevent economic loss does not exist. See Kapfunde v Abbey National plc (1998) 46 BMLR 176.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.