In professional negligence cases the reasonable man test (as illustrated in Nettleship v Weston [1971] 2QB 691, the ‘learner driver’ case) is slightly modified. In order to show a breach of duty, the claimant must first establish the standard of care that the doctor (for example) owes. The test utilised was actually developed in relation to clinical negligence but has been subsequently accepted to cover anyone exercising professional skills. This principle has become known as the Bolam test after the case [case].
Answer
Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All ER 118
Tags
#clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
In professional negligence cases the reasonable man test (as illustrated in Nettleship v Weston [1971] 2QB 691, the ‘learner driver’ case) is slightly modified. In order to show a breach of duty, the claimant must first establish the standard of care that the doctor (for example) owes. The test utilised was actually developed in relation to clinical negligence but has been subsequently accepted to cover anyone exercising professional skills. This principle has become known as the Bolam test after the case [case].
Answer
?
Tags
#clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
In professional negligence cases the reasonable man test (as illustrated in Nettleship v Weston [1971] 2QB 691, the ‘learner driver’ case) is slightly modified. In order to show a breach of duty, the claimant must first establish the standard of care that the doctor (for example) owes. The test utilised was actually developed in relation to clinical negligence but has been subsequently accepted to cover anyone exercising professional skills. This principle has become known as the Bolam test after the case [case].
Answer
Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All ER 118
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it for example) owes. The test utilised was actually developed in relation to clinical negligence but has been subsequently accepted to cover anyone exercising professional skills. This principle has become known as the Bolam test after the case <span>Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 2 All ER 118.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.