In Maynard v West Midlands RHA [1985] 1 WLR 634 the House of Lords refused to become entangled in choosing one professional opinion over another. In such situations, the Bolam test states that a doctor has to act [...]. It is perfectly valid to have conflicting professional opinions.
Answer
in accordance with a practice that is accepted by a reasonable body of medical opinion
Tags
#clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
In Maynard v West Midlands RHA [1985] 1 WLR 634 the House of Lords refused to become entangled in choosing one professional opinion over another. In such situations, the Bolam test states that a doctor has to act [...]. It is perfectly valid to have conflicting professional opinions.
Answer
?
Tags
#clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
In Maynard v West Midlands RHA [1985] 1 WLR 634 the House of Lords refused to become entangled in choosing one professional opinion over another. In such situations, the Bolam test states that a doctor has to act [...]. It is perfectly valid to have conflicting professional opinions.
Answer
in accordance with a practice that is accepted by a reasonable body of medical opinion
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it head><head>In Maynard v West Midlands RHA [1985] 1 WLR 634 the House of Lords refused to become entangled in choosing one professional opinion over another. In such situations, the Bolam test states that a doctor has to act in accordance with a practice that is accepted by a reasonable body of medical opinion. It is perfectly valid to have conflicting professional opinions.<html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.