Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
Factual causation is established by the ‘but for’ test from [case]; ‘but for’ the defendant’s action, would the victim have suffered the injury.
Answer
Cork v Kirby MacLean Ltd [1952] 2 All ER 402

Tags
#clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
Factual causation is established by the ‘but for’ test from [case]; ‘but for’ the defendant’s action, would the victim have suffered the injury.
Answer
?

Tags
#clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
Factual causation is established by the ‘but for’ test from [case]; ‘but for’ the defendant’s action, would the victim have suffered the injury.
Answer
Cork v Kirby MacLean Ltd [1952] 2 All ER 402
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
Factual causation is established by the ‘but for’ test from Cork v Kirby MacLean Ltd [1952] 2 All ER 402; ‘but for’ the defendant’s action, would the victim have suffered the injury.

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.