Factual causation is established by the ‘but for’ test from [case]; ‘but for’ the defendant’s action, would the victim have suffered the injury.
Answer
Cork v Kirby MacLean Ltd [1952] 2 All ER 402
Tags
#clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
Factual causation is established by the ‘but for’ test from [case]; ‘but for’ the defendant’s action, would the victim have suffered the injury.
Answer
?
Tags
#clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
Factual causation is established by the ‘but for’ test from [case]; ‘but for’ the defendant’s action, would the victim have suffered the injury.
Answer
Cork v Kirby MacLean Ltd [1952] 2 All ER 402
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Factual causation is established by the ‘but for’ test from Cork v Kirby MacLean Ltd [1952] 2 All ER 402; ‘but for’ the defendant’s action, would the victim have suffered the injury.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.