Unforeseeable risks can obviously not be anticipated and, therefore, failing to guard against them will not be regarded as negligence. This is often referred to as the State of Art issue and is probably best illustrated in [case].
Answer
Roe v Minister Of Health [1954] 2 QB 66
Tags
#clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
Unforeseeable risks can obviously not be anticipated and, therefore, failing to guard against them will not be regarded as negligence. This is often referred to as the State of Art issue and is probably best illustrated in [case].
Answer
?
Tags
#clinical-negligence #negligence #tort
Question
Unforeseeable risks can obviously not be anticipated and, therefore, failing to guard against them will not be regarded as negligence. This is often referred to as the State of Art issue and is probably best illustrated in [case].
Answer
Roe v Minister Of Health [1954] 2 QB 66
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it d>Unforeseeable risks can obviously not be anticipated and, therefore, failing to guard against them will not be regarded as negligence. This is often referred to as the State of Art issue and is probably best illustrated in Roe v Minister Of Health [1954] 2 QB 66.<html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.