The case of [case]again illustrated the ECtHR's approach in this area, which is not to treat the right to silence as an absolute right, but to treat each case on its merits. On the facts, the ECtHR found that there had been a violation of their article 6 rights at their criminal trial.
Answer
Condron v UK (2001) 31 EHRR 1
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
The case of [case]again illustrated the ECtHR's approach in this area, which is not to treat the right to silence as an absolute right, but to treat each case on its merits. On the facts, the ECtHR found that there had been a violation of their article 6 rights at their criminal trial.
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
The case of [case]again illustrated the ECtHR's approach in this area, which is not to treat the right to silence as an absolute right, but to treat each case on its merits. On the facts, the ECtHR found that there had been a violation of their article 6 rights at their criminal trial.
Answer
Condron v UK (2001) 31 EHRR 1
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it The case of Condron v UK (2001) 31 EHRR 1 again illustrated the ECtHR's approach in this area, which is not to treat the right to silence as an absolute right, but to treat each case on its merits. On the facts, the ECtHR found
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.