Smith, Ellis and Allbutt v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Snatch Land Rover claims
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Snatch Land Rover claims
Answer
Smith, Ellis and Allbutt v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it tably different context, the extent of the article 2 positive obligation was one of the key issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Smith, Ellis and Allbutt v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41. A majority of the Supreme Court held that the '<span>Snatch Land Rover claims' should not be struck out on the basis that they fell outside the scope of this obligation (and so the claimants were allowed to proceed to trial). Significantly, the dissenting justice
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.