Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Chahal v UK (1997) 23 EHRR 413 represents an extension of the principle of extra-territorial effect established in Soering. Chahal was an activist for the cause of Sikh separatism in India who was in the custody of the UK. The UK wanted to deport him to India on the grounds of his alleged criminal behaviour while in India, and the Indian government had indicated he would be welcomed back and treated properly. However, Chahal successfully argued that, [...], and that their official status (even if their action was not 'officially' sanctioned) would mean that the state would not intervene to protect him. Chahal thus extended the principle in Soering to apply where non-state actors represented the possible cause of the article 3 treatment.
Answer
while there would be no officially sanctioned action against him, he would be at 'real risk’ of mistreatment by rogue elements within the Punjab Police

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Chahal v UK (1997) 23 EHRR 413 represents an extension of the principle of extra-territorial effect established in Soering. Chahal was an activist for the cause of Sikh separatism in India who was in the custody of the UK. The UK wanted to deport him to India on the grounds of his alleged criminal behaviour while in India, and the Indian government had indicated he would be welcomed back and treated properly. However, Chahal successfully argued that, [...], and that their official status (even if their action was not 'officially' sanctioned) would mean that the state would not intervene to protect him. Chahal thus extended the principle in Soering to apply where non-state actors represented the possible cause of the article 3 treatment.
Answer
?

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Chahal v UK (1997) 23 EHRR 413 represents an extension of the principle of extra-territorial effect established in Soering. Chahal was an activist for the cause of Sikh separatism in India who was in the custody of the UK. The UK wanted to deport him to India on the grounds of his alleged criminal behaviour while in India, and the Indian government had indicated he would be welcomed back and treated properly. However, Chahal successfully argued that, [...], and that their official status (even if their action was not 'officially' sanctioned) would mean that the state would not intervene to protect him. Chahal thus extended the principle in Soering to apply where non-state actors represented the possible cause of the article 3 treatment.
Answer
while there would be no officially sanctioned action against him, he would be at 'real risk’ of mistreatment by rogue elements within the Punjab Police
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
of the UK. The UK wanted to deport him to India on the grounds of his alleged criminal behaviour while in India, and the Indian government had indicated he would be welcomed back and treated properly. However, Chahal successfully argued that, <span>while there would be no officially sanctioned action against him, he would be at 'real risk’ of mistreatment by rogue elements within the Punjab Police, and that their official status (even if their action was not 'officially' sanctioned) would mean that the state would not intervene to protect him. Chahal thus extended the principle i

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.