In [case], the Supreme Court found that the duty not to deport foreign nationals did not, as the Home Secretary sought to argue, just apply to countries where there was a real, ’systemic' risk of inhuman and degrading treatment. Instead, Convention law made it clear that each case should be considered on its own merits to decide if a real risk of this nature attached to the particular individual. This applied to the four applicants in this case who were resisting deportation to Italy, the state responsible for processing their asylum applications.
Answer
R (on application of EM (Eritrea) and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 12
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
In [case], the Supreme Court found that the duty not to deport foreign nationals did not, as the Home Secretary sought to argue, just apply to countries where there was a real, ’systemic' risk of inhuman and degrading treatment. Instead, Convention law made it clear that each case should be considered on its own merits to decide if a real risk of this nature attached to the particular individual. This applied to the four applicants in this case who were resisting deportation to Italy, the state responsible for processing their asylum applications.
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
In [case], the Supreme Court found that the duty not to deport foreign nationals did not, as the Home Secretary sought to argue, just apply to countries where there was a real, ’systemic' risk of inhuman and degrading treatment. Instead, Convention law made it clear that each case should be considered on its own merits to decide if a real risk of this nature attached to the particular individual. This applied to the four applicants in this case who were resisting deportation to Italy, the state responsible for processing their asylum applications.
Answer
R (on application of EM (Eritrea) and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 12
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In R (on application of EM (Eritrea) and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 12, the Supreme Court found that the duty not to deport foreign nationals did not, as the Home Secretary sought to argue, just apply to countries where there was a real, ’systemic' risk of
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.