It is very interesting to note, however, that as a result of the [case], the Court of Appeal has subsequently confirmed its view that the whole-life tariff regime, provided for in UK law, is compatible with the ECHR, art 3. This hinges on a clear difference of opinion between the courts with regard to the clarity of the relevant provision enabling release in exceptional circumstances. This view was further confirmed by the Court of Appeal in R v McLoughlin & Newell [2014] EWCA Crim 188, providing a further example of UK courts departing from Strasbourg jurisprudence when this is considered necessary.
Answer
Attorney-General's Reference (No 69 of 2013) [2014] EWCA Crim 188
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
It is very interesting to note, however, that as a result of the [case], the Court of Appeal has subsequently confirmed its view that the whole-life tariff regime, provided for in UK law, is compatible with the ECHR, art 3. This hinges on a clear difference of opinion between the courts with regard to the clarity of the relevant provision enabling release in exceptional circumstances. This view was further confirmed by the Court of Appeal in R v McLoughlin & Newell [2014] EWCA Crim 188, providing a further example of UK courts departing from Strasbourg jurisprudence when this is considered necessary.
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
It is very interesting to note, however, that as a result of the [case], the Court of Appeal has subsequently confirmed its view that the whole-life tariff regime, provided for in UK law, is compatible with the ECHR, art 3. This hinges on a clear difference of opinion between the courts with regard to the clarity of the relevant provision enabling release in exceptional circumstances. This view was further confirmed by the Court of Appeal in R v McLoughlin & Newell [2014] EWCA Crim 188, providing a further example of UK courts departing from Strasbourg jurisprudence when this is considered necessary.
Answer
Attorney-General's Reference (No 69 of 2013) [2014] EWCA Crim 188
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it It is very interesting to note, however, that as a result of the Attorney-General's Reference (No 69 of 2013) [2014] EWCA Crim 188, the Court of Appeal has subsequently confirmed its view that the whole-life tariff regime, provided for in UK law, is compatible with the ECHR, art 3. This hinges on a clear difference
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.