in Johnson v UK (1997) 27 EHRR 269, continual forced detention in a psychiatric facility following successful treatment, caused by problems with post- release facilities, was held to be unjustifiable under the ECHR, art 5(1). Forced psychiatric detention was highlighted as an area where the state had a [...], because the individual would (by definition) see their ability to challenge their detention become much reduced once they were labelled as requiring such detention.
Answer
particularly high duty to ensure that correct procedures were followed
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
in Johnson v UK (1997) 27 EHRR 269, continual forced detention in a psychiatric facility following successful treatment, caused by problems with post- release facilities, was held to be unjustifiable under the ECHR, art 5(1). Forced psychiatric detention was highlighted as an area where the state had a [...], because the individual would (by definition) see their ability to challenge their detention become much reduced once they were labelled as requiring such detention.
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
in Johnson v UK (1997) 27 EHRR 269, continual forced detention in a psychiatric facility following successful treatment, caused by problems with post- release facilities, was held to be unjustifiable under the ECHR, art 5(1). Forced psychiatric detention was highlighted as an area where the state had a [...], because the individual would (by definition) see their ability to challenge their detention become much reduced once they were labelled as requiring such detention.
Answer
particularly high duty to ensure that correct procedures were followed
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it n in a psychiatric facility following successful treatment, caused by problems with post- release facilities, was held to be unjustifiable under the ECHR, art 5(1). Forced psychiatric detention was highlighted as an area where the state had a <span>particularly high duty to ensure that correct procedures were followed, because the individual would (by definition) see their ability to challenge their detention become much reduced once they were labelled as requiring such detention.<span></body
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.