Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
in Johnson v UK (1997) 27 EHRR 269, continual forced detention in a psychiatric facility following successful treatment, caused by problems with post- release facilities, was held to be unjustifiable under the ECHR, art 5(1). Forced psychiatric detention was highlighted as an area where the state had a particularly high duty to ensure that correct procedures were followed, because [...].
Answer
the individual would (by definition) see their ability to challenge their detention become much reduced once they were labelled as requiring such detention

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
in Johnson v UK (1997) 27 EHRR 269, continual forced detention in a psychiatric facility following successful treatment, caused by problems with post- release facilities, was held to be unjustifiable under the ECHR, art 5(1). Forced psychiatric detention was highlighted as an area where the state had a particularly high duty to ensure that correct procedures were followed, because [...].
Answer
?

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
in Johnson v UK (1997) 27 EHRR 269, continual forced detention in a psychiatric facility following successful treatment, caused by problems with post- release facilities, was held to be unjustifiable under the ECHR, art 5(1). Forced psychiatric detention was highlighted as an area where the state had a particularly high duty to ensure that correct procedures were followed, because [...].
Answer
the individual would (by definition) see their ability to challenge their detention become much reduced once they were labelled as requiring such detention
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
ith post- release facilities, was held to be unjustifiable under the ECHR, art 5(1). Forced psychiatric detention was highlighted as an area where the state had a particularly high duty to ensure that correct procedures were followed, because <span>the individual would (by definition) see their ability to challenge their detention become much reduced once they were labelled as requiring such detention.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.