in [case], the House of Lords held that detention of asylum seekers for the purpose of enabling the authorities to decide whether to authorise entry into the UK was allowed by the ECHR, art 5(1)(f), as long as they were detained in reasonable conditions and not for excessive periods.
Answer
R (on the application of Saadi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] UKHL 41
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
in [case], the House of Lords held that detention of asylum seekers for the purpose of enabling the authorities to decide whether to authorise entry into the UK was allowed by the ECHR, art 5(1)(f), as long as they were detained in reasonable conditions and not for excessive periods.
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
in [case], the House of Lords held that detention of asylum seekers for the purpose of enabling the authorities to decide whether to authorise entry into the UK was allowed by the ECHR, art 5(1)(f), as long as they were detained in reasonable conditions and not for excessive periods.
Answer
R (on the application of Saadi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] UKHL 41
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it in R (on the application of Saadi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] UKHL 41, the House of Lords held that detention of asylum seekers for the purpose of enabling the authorities to decide whether to authorise entry into the UK was allowed by the ECHR, art 5(1)(
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.