Fox, Campbell and Hartley v UK, referred to above, also involved discussion of the ECHR, art 5(2). On this point, the court held that simply informing someone at the time of their arrest that they were being arrested on suspicion of being a terrorist (i.e. a broad allegation) [...]. However, subsequent questioning in relation to specific offences did provide enough detail for the person questioned to understand why they were arrested, so ultimately satisfying the requirements of the ECHR, art 5(2).
Answer
did not satisfy this part of the article
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Fox, Campbell and Hartley v UK, referred to above, also involved discussion of the ECHR, art 5(2). On this point, the court held that simply informing someone at the time of their arrest that they were being arrested on suspicion of being a terrorist (i.e. a broad allegation) [...]. However, subsequent questioning in relation to specific offences did provide enough detail for the person questioned to understand why they were arrested, so ultimately satisfying the requirements of the ECHR, art 5(2).
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Fox, Campbell and Hartley v UK, referred to above, also involved discussion of the ECHR, art 5(2). On this point, the court held that simply informing someone at the time of their arrest that they were being arrested on suspicion of being a terrorist (i.e. a broad allegation) [...]. However, subsequent questioning in relation to specific offences did provide enough detail for the person questioned to understand why they were arrested, so ultimately satisfying the requirements of the ECHR, art 5(2).
Answer
did not satisfy this part of the article
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it ferred to above, also involved discussion of the ECHR, art 5(2). On this point, the court held that simply informing someone at the time of their arrest that they were being arrested on suspicion of being a terrorist (i.e. a broad allegation) <span>did not satisfy this part of the article. However, subsequent questioning in relation to specific offences did provide enough detail for the person questioned to understand why they were arrested, so ultimately satisfying the
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.