Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Fox, Campbell and Hartley v UK, referred to above, also involved discussion of the ECHR, art 5(2). On this point, the court held that simply informing someone at the time of their arrest that they were being arrested on suspicion of being a terrorist (i.e. a broad allegation) [...]. However, subsequent questioning in relation to specific offences did provide enough detail for the person questioned to understand why they were arrested, so ultimately satisfying the requirements of the ECHR, art 5(2).
Answer
did not satisfy this part of the article

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Fox, Campbell and Hartley v UK, referred to above, also involved discussion of the ECHR, art 5(2). On this point, the court held that simply informing someone at the time of their arrest that they were being arrested on suspicion of being a terrorist (i.e. a broad allegation) [...]. However, subsequent questioning in relation to specific offences did provide enough detail for the person questioned to understand why they were arrested, so ultimately satisfying the requirements of the ECHR, art 5(2).
Answer
?

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Fox, Campbell and Hartley v UK, referred to above, also involved discussion of the ECHR, art 5(2). On this point, the court held that simply informing someone at the time of their arrest that they were being arrested on suspicion of being a terrorist (i.e. a broad allegation) [...]. However, subsequent questioning in relation to specific offences did provide enough detail for the person questioned to understand why they were arrested, so ultimately satisfying the requirements of the ECHR, art 5(2).
Answer
did not satisfy this part of the article
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
ferred to above, also involved discussion of the ECHR, art 5(2). On this point, the court held that simply informing someone at the time of their arrest that they were being arrested on suspicion of being a terrorist (i.e. a broad allegation) <span>did not satisfy this part of the article. However, subsequent questioning in relation to specific offences did provide enough detail for the person questioned to understand why they were arrested, so ultimately satisfying the

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.