Question
Fox, Campbell and Hartley v UK, referred to above, also involved discussion of the ECHR, art 5(2). On this point, the court held that simply informing someone at the time of their arrest that they were being arrested on suspicion of being a terrorist (i.e. a broad allegation) did not satisfy this part of the article. However, [...] did provide enough detail for the person questioned to understand why they were arrested, so ultimately satisfying the requirements of the ECHR, art 5(2).