This concerned restrictions imposed on an individual by the Italian authorities analogous to some of those contained in the UK’s non-derogating control orders. Mr Guzzardi, an alleged 'mafioso', who was described by the Italian authorities as 'one of the most dangerous' of individuals, had been confined to an area on a small island constituting about 2½km² for 16 months. It contained a basic village inhabited by others subject to similar orders. His family was able to live with him and he was allowed to look for work. He had to report to the police twice a day and had to get permission from the police before making a phone call or seeing a visitor. This situation was compared by the ECtHR to that of a person in an open prison.
Answer
Guzzardi v Italy (1980) 3 EHRR 333
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
This concerned restrictions imposed on an individual by the Italian authorities analogous to some of those contained in the UK’s non-derogating control orders. Mr Guzzardi, an alleged 'mafioso', who was described by the Italian authorities as 'one of the most dangerous' of individuals, had been confined to an area on a small island constituting about 2½km² for 16 months. It contained a basic village inhabited by others subject to similar orders. His family was able to live with him and he was allowed to look for work. He had to report to the police twice a day and had to get permission from the police before making a phone call or seeing a visitor. This situation was compared by the ECtHR to that of a person in an open prison.
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
This concerned restrictions imposed on an individual by the Italian authorities analogous to some of those contained in the UK’s non-derogating control orders. Mr Guzzardi, an alleged 'mafioso', who was described by the Italian authorities as 'one of the most dangerous' of individuals, had been confined to an area on a small island constituting about 2½km² for 16 months. It contained a basic village inhabited by others subject to similar orders. His family was able to live with him and he was allowed to look for work. He had to report to the police twice a day and had to get permission from the police before making a phone call or seeing a visitor. This situation was compared by the ECtHR to that of a person in an open prison.
Answer
Guzzardi v Italy (1980) 3 EHRR 333
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Guzzardi v Italy (1980) 3 EHRR 333. This concerned restrictions imposed on an individual by the Italian authorities analogous to some of those contained in the UK’s non-derogating control orders. Mr Guzzardi, an alleged
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.