Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
This concerned restrictions imposed on an individual by the Italian authorities analogous to some of those contained in the UK’s non-derogating control orders. Mr Guzzardi, an alleged 'mafioso', who was described by the Italian authorities as 'one of the most dangerous' of individuals, had been confined to an area on a small island constituting about 2½km² for 16 months. It contained a basic village inhabited by others subject to similar orders. His family was able to live with him and he was allowed to look for work. He had to report to the police twice a day and had to get permission from the police before making a phone call or seeing a visitor. This situation was compared by the ECtHR to that of a person in an open prison.
Answer
Guzzardi v Italy (1980) 3 EHRR 333

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
This concerned restrictions imposed on an individual by the Italian authorities analogous to some of those contained in the UK’s non-derogating control orders. Mr Guzzardi, an alleged 'mafioso', who was described by the Italian authorities as 'one of the most dangerous' of individuals, had been confined to an area on a small island constituting about 2½km² for 16 months. It contained a basic village inhabited by others subject to similar orders. His family was able to live with him and he was allowed to look for work. He had to report to the police twice a day and had to get permission from the police before making a phone call or seeing a visitor. This situation was compared by the ECtHR to that of a person in an open prison.
Answer
?

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
This concerned restrictions imposed on an individual by the Italian authorities analogous to some of those contained in the UK’s non-derogating control orders. Mr Guzzardi, an alleged 'mafioso', who was described by the Italian authorities as 'one of the most dangerous' of individuals, had been confined to an area on a small island constituting about 2½km² for 16 months. It contained a basic village inhabited by others subject to similar orders. His family was able to live with him and he was allowed to look for work. He had to report to the police twice a day and had to get permission from the police before making a phone call or seeing a visitor. This situation was compared by the ECtHR to that of a person in an open prison.
Answer
Guzzardi v Italy (1980) 3 EHRR 333
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
Guzzardi v Italy (1980) 3 EHRR 333. This concerned restrictions imposed on an individual by the Italian authorities analogous to some of those contained in the UK’s non-derogating control orders. Mr Guzzardi, an alleged

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.