Guzzardi v Italy (1980) 3 EHRR 333. This concerned restrictions imposed on an individual by the Italian authorities analogous to some of those contained in the UK’s non-derogating control orders. Mr Guzzardi, an alleged 'mafioso', who was described by the Italian authorities as 'one of the most dangerous' of individuals, had been confined to an area on a small island constituting about 2½km² for 16 months. It contained a basic village inhabited by others subject to similar orders. His family was able to live with him and he was allowed to look for work. He had to [...]and had to get permission from the police before making a phone call or seeing a visitor. This situation was compared by the ECtHR to that of a person in an open prison.
Answer
report to the police twice a day
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Guzzardi v Italy (1980) 3 EHRR 333. This concerned restrictions imposed on an individual by the Italian authorities analogous to some of those contained in the UK’s non-derogating control orders. Mr Guzzardi, an alleged 'mafioso', who was described by the Italian authorities as 'one of the most dangerous' of individuals, had been confined to an area on a small island constituting about 2½km² for 16 months. It contained a basic village inhabited by others subject to similar orders. His family was able to live with him and he was allowed to look for work. He had to [...]and had to get permission from the police before making a phone call or seeing a visitor. This situation was compared by the ECtHR to that of a person in an open prison.
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Guzzardi v Italy (1980) 3 EHRR 333. This concerned restrictions imposed on an individual by the Italian authorities analogous to some of those contained in the UK’s non-derogating control orders. Mr Guzzardi, an alleged 'mafioso', who was described by the Italian authorities as 'one of the most dangerous' of individuals, had been confined to an area on a small island constituting about 2½km² for 16 months. It contained a basic village inhabited by others subject to similar orders. His family was able to live with him and he was allowed to look for work. He had to [...]and had to get permission from the police before making a phone call or seeing a visitor. This situation was compared by the ECtHR to that of a person in an open prison.
Answer
report to the police twice a day
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it been confined to an area on a small island constituting about 2½km² for 16 months. It contained a basic village inhabited by others subject to similar orders. His family was able to live with him and he was allowed to look for work. He had to <span>report to the police twice a day and had to get permission from the police before making a phone call or seeing a visitor. This situation was compared by the ECtHR to that of a person in an open prison.<span></b
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.