the protection of a fair trial under the ECHR, art 6(1) is engaged where there is a 'determination of a person's civil rights and obligations'. In Re MB, it was accepted that [...]and therefore that the ECHR, art 6 had been engaged. A majority of the House of Lords held that the involvement of a special advocate was, in principle, capable of assuaging any disadvantage flowing from non-disclosure, and that the regime was therefore not in breach of the ECHR, art 6(1).
Answer
a control order would affect such rights
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
the protection of a fair trial under the ECHR, art 6(1) is engaged where there is a 'determination of a person's civil rights and obligations'. In Re MB, it was accepted that [...]and therefore that the ECHR, art 6 had been engaged. A majority of the House of Lords held that the involvement of a special advocate was, in principle, capable of assuaging any disadvantage flowing from non-disclosure, and that the regime was therefore not in breach of the ECHR, art 6(1).
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
the protection of a fair trial under the ECHR, art 6(1) is engaged where there is a 'determination of a person's civil rights and obligations'. In Re MB, it was accepted that [...]and therefore that the ECHR, art 6 had been engaged. A majority of the House of Lords held that the involvement of a special advocate was, in principle, capable of assuaging any disadvantage flowing from non-disclosure, and that the regime was therefore not in breach of the ECHR, art 6(1).
Answer
a control order would affect such rights
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it the protection of a fair trial under the ECHR, art 6(1) is engaged where there is a 'determination of a person's civil rights and obligations'. In Re MB, it was accepted that a control order would affect such rights and therefore that the ECHR, art 6 had been engaged. A majority of the House of Lords held that the involvement of a special advocate was, in principle, capable of assuaging any disadvan
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.