Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.


  • Presentation
  • Question
  • Answer

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
the protection of a fair trial under the ECHR, art 6(1) is engaged where there is a 'determination of a person's civil rights and obligations'. In Re MB, it was accepted that a control order would affect such rights and therefore that the ECHR, art 6 had been engaged. A majority of the House of Lords held that the involvement of a special advocate was, in principle, capable of assuaging any disadvantage flowing from non-disclosure, and that the regime was therefore not in breach of the ECHR, art [...].
Answer
6(1)

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
the protection of a fair trial under the ECHR, art 6(1) is engaged where there is a 'determination of a person's civil rights and obligations'. In Re MB, it was accepted that a control order would affect such rights and therefore that the ECHR, art 6 had been engaged. A majority of the House of Lords held that the involvement of a special advocate was, in principle, capable of assuaging any disadvantage flowing from non-disclosure, and that the regime was therefore not in breach of the ECHR, art [...].
Answer
?

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
the protection of a fair trial under the ECHR, art 6(1) is engaged where there is a 'determination of a person's civil rights and obligations'. In Re MB, it was accepted that a control order would affect such rights and therefore that the ECHR, art 6 had been engaged. A majority of the House of Lords held that the involvement of a special advocate was, in principle, capable of assuaging any disadvantage flowing from non-disclosure, and that the regime was therefore not in breach of the ECHR, art [...].
Answer
6(1)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
n engaged. A majority of the House of Lords held that the involvement of a special advocate was, in principle, capable of assuaging any disadvantage flowing from non-disclosure, and that the regime was therefore not in breach of the ECHR, art <span>6(1).<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions

Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.