In Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2), [2013] UKSC 39, Lord Hope concluded that the ECHR, art 6 was not engaged as [...]. Therefore, at the point in the process at which the bank was claiming that its ECHR, art 6 rights were violated (because of the lack of opportunity it had to counter the allegations against it), the overall issue had not yet reached a determination in his view.
Answer
the bank had the benefit of the remaining safeguard of being able to apply to the High Court to set aside the direction made against it (which prevented it from operating in the UK)
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
In Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2), [2013] UKSC 39, Lord Hope concluded that the ECHR, art 6 was not engaged as [...]. Therefore, at the point in the process at which the bank was claiming that its ECHR, art 6 rights were violated (because of the lack of opportunity it had to counter the allegations against it), the overall issue had not yet reached a determination in his view.
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
In Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2), [2013] UKSC 39, Lord Hope concluded that the ECHR, art 6 was not engaged as [...]. Therefore, at the point in the process at which the bank was claiming that its ECHR, art 6 rights were violated (because of the lack of opportunity it had to counter the allegations against it), the overall issue had not yet reached a determination in his view.
Answer
the bank had the benefit of the remaining safeguard of being able to apply to the High Court to set aside the direction made against it (which prevented it from operating in the UK)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2), [2013] UKSC 39, Lord Hope concluded that the ECHR, art 6 was not engaged as the bank had the benefit of the remaining safeguard of being able to apply to the High Court to set aside the direction made against it (which prevented it from operating in the UK). Therefore, at the point in the process at which the bank was claiming that its ECHR, art 6 rights were violated (because of the lack of opportunity it had to counter the allegations ag
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.