Without obtaining a far clearer undertaking from the Jordanian Government, the ECtHR considered that a deportation by UK authorities would amount to a violation of the ECHR, art 6 because of the real risk of evidence, which had been secured through torture, being used against the applicant in the Jordanian criminal justice system. This risk was seen to represent a flagrant denial of justice and its prohibition was considered to be fundamental by the ECtHR.
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Othman v UK (2012) 55 EHRR 1
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Othman v UK (2012) 55 EHRR 1
Answer
Without obtaining a far clearer undertaking from the Jordanian Government, the ECtHR considered that a deportation by UK authorities would amount to a violation of the ECHR, art 6 because of the real risk of evidence, which had been secured through torture, being used against the applicant in the Jordanian criminal justice system. This risk was seen to represent a flagrant denial of justice and its prohibition was considered to be fundamental by the ECtHR.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it case of Othman v UK (2012) 55 EHRR 1, (involving the individual also known as Abu Qatada). Without obtaining a far clearer undertaking from the Jordanian Government, the ECtHR considered that a deportation by UK authoritie
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.