Where the court did find for Murray was in its conclusion that the ECHR, art 6(1) read with art 6(3)(c) had been violated because of the denial of access by Murray to legal advice for the first [...]he was detained and questioned by police in circumstances where adverse inferences could be drawn from his silence.
Answer
48 hours
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Where the court did find for Murray was in its conclusion that the ECHR, art 6(1) read with art 6(3)(c) had been violated because of the denial of access by Murray to legal advice for the first [...]he was detained and questioned by police in circumstances where adverse inferences could be drawn from his silence.
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Where the court did find for Murray was in its conclusion that the ECHR, art 6(1) read with art 6(3)(c) had been violated because of the denial of access by Murray to legal advice for the first [...]he was detained and questioned by police in circumstances where adverse inferences could be drawn from his silence.
Answer
48 hours
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Where the court did find for Murray was in its conclusion that the ECHR, art 6(1) read with art 6(3)(c) had been violated because of the denial of access by Murray to legal advice for the first 48 hours he was detained and questioned by police in circumstances where adverse inferences could be drawn from his silence.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.