In [case], the House of Lords declared that the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, s 41(3)(c), which prevented the defendant in a rape trial from adducing evidence relating to the complainant's sexual history, would impede his right to a fair trial in violation of the ECHR, art 6(1).
Answer
R v A (Complainant's Sexual History) (No 2) [2001] 2 WLR 1546
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
In [case], the House of Lords declared that the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, s 41(3)(c), which prevented the defendant in a rape trial from adducing evidence relating to the complainant's sexual history, would impede his right to a fair trial in violation of the ECHR, art 6(1).
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
In [case], the House of Lords declared that the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, s 41(3)(c), which prevented the defendant in a rape trial from adducing evidence relating to the complainant's sexual history, would impede his right to a fair trial in violation of the ECHR, art 6(1).
Answer
R v A (Complainant's Sexual History) (No 2) [2001] 2 WLR 1546
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In R v A (Complainant's Sexual History) (No 2) [2001] 2 WLR 1546, the House of Lords declared that the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, s 41(3)(c), which prevented the defendant in a rape trial from adducing evidence relating to the comp
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.