In [case], for instance, the Family Division of the High Court held that the withdrawal of treatment (through hydration and nutrition) to M, a patient in a persistent vegetative state, would not constitute a breach of the ECHR, art 2. The state was not considered to be under an obligation to prolong M's life.
Answer
NHS Trust A v M; NHS Trust B v H [2001] 1 All ER 801
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
In [case], for instance, the Family Division of the High Court held that the withdrawal of treatment (through hydration and nutrition) to M, a patient in a persistent vegetative state, would not constitute a breach of the ECHR, art 2. The state was not considered to be under an obligation to prolong M's life.
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
In [case], for instance, the Family Division of the High Court held that the withdrawal of treatment (through hydration and nutrition) to M, a patient in a persistent vegetative state, would not constitute a breach of the ECHR, art 2. The state was not considered to be under an obligation to prolong M's life.
Answer
NHS Trust A v M; NHS Trust B v H [2001] 1 All ER 801
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In NHS Trust A v M; NHS Trust B v H [2001] 1 All ER 801, for instance, the Family Division of the High Court held that the withdrawal of treatment (through hydration and nutrition) to M, a patient in a persistent vegetative state, would not
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.