In NHS Trust A v M; NHS Trust B v H [2001] 1 All ER 801, for instance, the Family Division of the High Court held that the withdrawal of treatment (through hydration and nutrition) to M, a [...], would not constitute a breach of the ECHR, art 2. The state was not considered to be under an obligation to prolong M's life.
Answer
patient in a persistent vegetative state
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
In NHS Trust A v M; NHS Trust B v H [2001] 1 All ER 801, for instance, the Family Division of the High Court held that the withdrawal of treatment (through hydration and nutrition) to M, a [...], would not constitute a breach of the ECHR, art 2. The state was not considered to be under an obligation to prolong M's life.
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
In NHS Trust A v M; NHS Trust B v H [2001] 1 All ER 801, for instance, the Family Division of the High Court held that the withdrawal of treatment (through hydration and nutrition) to M, a [...], would not constitute a breach of the ECHR, art 2. The state was not considered to be under an obligation to prolong M's life.
Answer
patient in a persistent vegetative state
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In NHS Trust A v M; NHS Trust B v H [2001] 1 All ER 801, for instance, the Family Division of the High Court held that the withdrawal of treatment (through hydration and nutrition) to M, a patient in a persistent vegetative state, would not constitute a breach of the ECHR, art 2. The state was not considered to be under an obligation to prolong M's life.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.