Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Article 6(3)(c) of the ECHR entitles a person charged with a criminal offence 'to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing'. This right, read in conjunction with the ECHR, art 6(1), has seen the ECtHR recognise a right for a suspect to have access to legal advice in the context of police investigation and questioning (see, for example, the Murray case, and note also the Brennan case). Any such right is not absolute but, as the [case] case shows, denial of such access may under certain circumstances be seen to interfere with the fairness of the overall, subsequent trial process.
Answer
Murray

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Article 6(3)(c) of the ECHR entitles a person charged with a criminal offence 'to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing'. This right, read in conjunction with the ECHR, art 6(1), has seen the ECtHR recognise a right for a suspect to have access to legal advice in the context of police investigation and questioning (see, for example, the Murray case, and note also the Brennan case). Any such right is not absolute but, as the [case] case shows, denial of such access may under certain circumstances be seen to interfere with the fairness of the overall, subsequent trial process.
Answer
?

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Article 6(3)(c) of the ECHR entitles a person charged with a criminal offence 'to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing'. This right, read in conjunction with the ECHR, art 6(1), has seen the ECtHR recognise a right for a suspect to have access to legal advice in the context of police investigation and questioning (see, for example, the Murray case, and note also the Brennan case). Any such right is not absolute but, as the [case] case shows, denial of such access may under certain circumstances be seen to interfere with the fairness of the overall, subsequent trial process.
Answer
Murray
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
en the ECtHR recognise a right for a suspect to have access to legal advice in the context of police investigation and questioning (see, for example, the Murray case, and note also the Brennan case). Any such right is not absolute but, as the <span>Murray case shows, denial of such access may under certain circumstances be seen to interfere with the fairness of the overall, subsequent trial process.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.