The right to examine a witness contained in the ECHR, art 6(3)(d) is based on the principle that, before an accused can be convicted, all the evidence must normally be produced in his presence at a public hearing so that it can be challenged. A conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness is generally considered to be incompatible with the requirements of fairness under the ECHR, art 6. However (and taking the same view of the Supreme Court in Horncastle), a conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness does not automatically result in a breach of the ECHR, art 6 if [...].
Answer
accompanied by other very strong procedural safeguards
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
The right to examine a witness contained in the ECHR, art 6(3)(d) is based on the principle that, before an accused can be convicted, all the evidence must normally be produced in his presence at a public hearing so that it can be challenged. A conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness is generally considered to be incompatible with the requirements of fairness under the ECHR, art 6. However (and taking the same view of the Supreme Court in Horncastle), a conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness does not automatically result in a breach of the ECHR, art 6 if [...].
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
The right to examine a witness contained in the ECHR, art 6(3)(d) is based on the principle that, before an accused can be convicted, all the evidence must normally be produced in his presence at a public hearing so that it can be challenged. A conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness is generally considered to be incompatible with the requirements of fairness under the ECHR, art 6. However (and taking the same view of the Supreme Court in Horncastle), a conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness does not automatically result in a breach of the ECHR, art 6 if [...].
Answer
accompanied by other very strong procedural safeguards
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it irness under the ECHR, art 6. However (and taking the same view of the Supreme Court in Horncastle), a conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness does not automatically result in a breach of the ECHR, art 6 if <span>accompanied by other very strong procedural safeguards.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.