Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
The right to examine a witness contained in the ECHR, art 6(3)(d) is based on the principle that, before an accused can be convicted, all the evidence must normally be produced in his presence at a public hearing so that it can be challenged. A conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness is generally considered to be incompatible with the requirements of fairness under the ECHR, art 6. However (and taking the same view of the Supreme Court in [case]), a conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness does not automatically result in a breach of the ECHR, art 6 if accompanied by other very strong procedural safeguards.
Answer
Horncastle

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
The right to examine a witness contained in the ECHR, art 6(3)(d) is based on the principle that, before an accused can be convicted, all the evidence must normally be produced in his presence at a public hearing so that it can be challenged. A conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness is generally considered to be incompatible with the requirements of fairness under the ECHR, art 6. However (and taking the same view of the Supreme Court in [case]), a conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness does not automatically result in a breach of the ECHR, art 6 if accompanied by other very strong procedural safeguards.
Answer
?

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
The right to examine a witness contained in the ECHR, art 6(3)(d) is based on the principle that, before an accused can be convicted, all the evidence must normally be produced in his presence at a public hearing so that it can be challenged. A conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness is generally considered to be incompatible with the requirements of fairness under the ECHR, art 6. However (and taking the same view of the Supreme Court in [case]), a conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness does not automatically result in a breach of the ECHR, art 6 if accompanied by other very strong procedural safeguards.
Answer
Horncastle
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
enged. A conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness is generally considered to be incompatible with the requirements of fairness under the ECHR, art 6. However (and taking the same view of the Supreme Court in <span>Horncastle), a conviction based solely or decisively on the statement of an absent witness does not automatically result in a breach of the ECHR, art 6 if accompanied by other very strong procedur

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.