Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
The case of [case] concerned the broad principle of due legal process that someone should be considered innocent until they are proven guilty, though this took place in a civil law context. In this case, allegations of abuse had been made against various NHS employees who were then put on a provisional employment blacklist. The law lords concluded that this practice was a breach of the duty of fairness owed to the individuals, who had not had the opportunity to put representations forward to dispute the allegations made against them.
Answer
R (on the application of Wright and Others) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] UKHL 3

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
The case of [case] concerned the broad principle of due legal process that someone should be considered innocent until they are proven guilty, though this took place in a civil law context. In this case, allegations of abuse had been made against various NHS employees who were then put on a provisional employment blacklist. The law lords concluded that this practice was a breach of the duty of fairness owed to the individuals, who had not had the opportunity to put representations forward to dispute the allegations made against them.
Answer
?

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
The case of [case] concerned the broad principle of due legal process that someone should be considered innocent until they are proven guilty, though this took place in a civil law context. In this case, allegations of abuse had been made against various NHS employees who were then put on a provisional employment blacklist. The law lords concluded that this practice was a breach of the duty of fairness owed to the individuals, who had not had the opportunity to put representations forward to dispute the allegations made against them.
Answer
R (on the application of Wright and Others) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] UKHL 3
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
The case of R (on the application of Wright and Others) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] UKHL 3 concerned the broad principle of due legal process that someone should be considered innocent until they are proven guilty, though this took place in a civil law context. In this case, a

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.