In Murray, the ECtHR acknowledged the importance of the right to silence to a fair criminal process as protected through the ECHR, art 6, but it also accepted that the right is not absolute. A defendant’s silence could be taken into account where there was other strong evidence against him, as there was against Murray. Where the court did find for Murray was in its conclusion that the ECHR, art [...]had been violated because of the denial of access by Murray to legal advice for the first 48 hours he was detained and questioned by police in circumstances where adverse inferences could be drawn from his silence.
Answer
6(1) read with art 6(3)(c)
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
In Murray, the ECtHR acknowledged the importance of the right to silence to a fair criminal process as protected through the ECHR, art 6, but it also accepted that the right is not absolute. A defendant’s silence could be taken into account where there was other strong evidence against him, as there was against Murray. Where the court did find for Murray was in its conclusion that the ECHR, art [...]had been violated because of the denial of access by Murray to legal advice for the first 48 hours he was detained and questioned by police in circumstances where adverse inferences could be drawn from his silence.
Answer
?
Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
In Murray, the ECtHR acknowledged the importance of the right to silence to a fair criminal process as protected through the ECHR, art 6, but it also accepted that the right is not absolute. A defendant’s silence could be taken into account where there was other strong evidence against him, as there was against Murray. Where the court did find for Murray was in its conclusion that the ECHR, art [...]had been violated because of the denial of access by Murray to legal advice for the first 48 hours he was detained and questioned by police in circumstances where adverse inferences could be drawn from his silence.
Answer
6(1) read with art 6(3)(c)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it ted that the right is not absolute. A defendant’s silence could be taken into account where there was other strong evidence against him, as there was against Murray. Where the court did find for Murray was in its conclusion that the ECHR, art <span>6(1) read with art 6(3)(c) had been violated because of the denial of access by Murray to legal advice for the first 48 hours he was detained and questioned by police in circumstances where adverse inferences coul
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.