BuboFlash - helps with learning

Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.

Presentation
Question

Answer

Tags

#cases #illegality #judicial-review #public

Question

When trying to establish what are, and what are not relevant considerations for a decision maker to take into account, regard must first be had to [...]. In Hanks v Minister of Housing and Local Government [1963] 1 QB 999 Megaw J said:

‘…[I]f it be shown that an authority exercising a power has taken into account as a relevant factor something that which it should not properly have taken into account in deciding whether or not to exercise the power, then the exercise of the power, normally at least, is bad. Similarly, if the authority fails to take into account as a relevant factor something which is relevant, and which it ought to have taken into account, the exercise of the power is normally bad’.

Answer

any relevant statute itself

Tags

#cases #illegality #judicial-review #public

Question

When trying to establish what are, and what are not relevant considerations for a decision maker to take into account, regard must first be had to [...]. In Hanks v Minister of Housing and Local Government [1963] 1 QB 999 Megaw J said:

‘…[I]f it be shown that an authority exercising a power has taken into account as a relevant factor something that which it should not properly have taken into account in deciding whether or not to exercise the power, then the exercise of the power, normally at least, is bad. Similarly, if the authority fails to take into account as a relevant factor something which is relevant, and which it ought to have taken into account, the exercise of the power is normally bad’.

Answer

?

Tags

#cases #illegality #judicial-review #public

Question

When trying to establish what are, and what are not relevant considerations for a decision maker to take into account, regard must first be had to [...]. In Hanks v Minister of Housing and Local Government [1963] 1 QB 999 Megaw J said:

‘…[I]f it be shown that an authority exercising a power has taken into account as a relevant factor something that which it should not properly have taken into account in deciding whether or not to exercise the power, then the exercise of the power, normally at least, is bad. Similarly, if the authority fails to take into account as a relevant factor something which is relevant, and which it ought to have taken into account, the exercise of the power is normally bad’.

Answer

any relevant statute itself

If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
When trying to establish what are, and what are not relevant considerations for a decision maker to take into account, regard must first be had to any relevant statute itself. In Hanks v Minister of Housing and Local Government [1963] 1 QB 999 Megaw J said: ‘…[I]f it be shown that an authority exercising a power has taken into account as a relev

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

status	not learned		measured difficulty	37% [default]		last interval [days]
repetition number in this series	0		memorised on			scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval			last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions

Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.