Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#cases #illegality #judicial-review #public
Question
In the case of R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Doody [1993] AC 157, which dealt with whether the Secretary of State for the Home Department could delegate the function of setting a tariff period for life sentence prisoners, the Court of Appeal said: ‘there is no express or implied requirement in the Criminal Justice Act 1967 that a decision fixing the tariff period, or for that matter a decision to release a prisoner on licence, must be taken by the Secretary of State personally’ (per Staughton LJ). This seems to suggest that, [...].
Answer
unless delegation is excluded specifically or by necessary implication, no power is non- delegable within a department

Tags
#cases #illegality #judicial-review #public
Question
In the case of R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Doody [1993] AC 157, which dealt with whether the Secretary of State for the Home Department could delegate the function of setting a tariff period for life sentence prisoners, the Court of Appeal said: ‘there is no express or implied requirement in the Criminal Justice Act 1967 that a decision fixing the tariff period, or for that matter a decision to release a prisoner on licence, must be taken by the Secretary of State personally’ (per Staughton LJ). This seems to suggest that, [...].
Answer
?

Tags
#cases #illegality #judicial-review #public
Question
In the case of R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Doody [1993] AC 157, which dealt with whether the Secretary of State for the Home Department could delegate the function of setting a tariff period for life sentence prisoners, the Court of Appeal said: ‘there is no express or implied requirement in the Criminal Justice Act 1967 that a decision fixing the tariff period, or for that matter a decision to release a prisoner on licence, must be taken by the Secretary of State personally’ (per Staughton LJ). This seems to suggest that, [...].
Answer
unless delegation is excluded specifically or by necessary implication, no power is non- delegable within a department
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
t in the Criminal Justice Act 1967 that a decision fixing the tariff period, or for that matter a decision to release a prisoner on licence, must be taken by the Secretary of State personally’ (per Staughton LJ). This seems to suggest that, <span>unless delegation is excluded specifically or by necessary implication, no power is non- delegable within a department.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.