Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#illegality #judicial-review #public
Question
A public body will not have acted unlawfully if did something that was reasonably incidental to or consequent upon a power that it did have.
Answer
Westminster Corporation v London & North West Railway [1905] AC 426

Tags
#illegality #judicial-review #public
Question
A public body will not have acted unlawfully if did something that was reasonably incidental to or consequent upon a power that it did have.
Answer
?

Tags
#illegality #judicial-review #public
Question
A public body will not have acted unlawfully if did something that was reasonably incidental to or consequent upon a power that it did have.
Answer
Westminster Corporation v London & North West Railway [1905] AC 426
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
However, a public body will not have acted unlawfully if did something that was reasonably incidental to or consequent upon a power that it did have. For example, the House of Lords held in Westminster Corporation v London & North West Railway [1905] AC 426 that a power to build public lavatories could also be used to build a subway under a road that was necessary in order to access those lavatories.

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.