In R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khawaja, [1984] AC 74 the power to detain an illegal entrant was worded objectively in the relevant statute; the provision stated that persons may be detained if they are ’an illegal entrant'. This represented a [...], which had to been shown to exist for the power to detain to arise in the first place. Thus, the court itself could review the facts to ensure that the person was indeed an illegal entrant.
Answer
'precedent fact'
Tags
#illegality #judicial-review #public
Question
In R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khawaja, [1984] AC 74 the power to detain an illegal entrant was worded objectively in the relevant statute; the provision stated that persons may be detained if they are ’an illegal entrant'. This represented a [...], which had to been shown to exist for the power to detain to arise in the first place. Thus, the court itself could review the facts to ensure that the person was indeed an illegal entrant.
Answer
?
Tags
#illegality #judicial-review #public
Question
In R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khawaja, [1984] AC 74 the power to detain an illegal entrant was worded objectively in the relevant statute; the provision stated that persons may be detained if they are ’an illegal entrant'. This represented a [...], which had to been shown to exist for the power to detain to arise in the first place. Thus, the court itself could review the facts to ensure that the person was indeed an illegal entrant.
Answer
'precedent fact'
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it e Home Department, ex parte Khawaja, [1984] AC 74 the power to detain an illegal entrant was worded objectively in the relevant statute; the provision stated that persons may be detained if they are ’an illegal entrant'. This represented a <span>'precedent fact', which had to been shown to exist for the power to detain to arise in the first place. Thus, the court itself could review the facts to ensure that the person was indeed an illegal en
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.