In [case], a local authority had failed to consider a relevant factor when increasing wages for its low-wage workers above the market rate. The House of Lords held that, despite the local authority's desire to better the workers' conditions, it had had no regard to the interests of ratepayers (a relevant factor) when coming to its decision.
Answer
Roberts v Hopwood [1925] AC 578
Tags
#illegality #judicial-review #public
Question
In [case], a local authority had failed to consider a relevant factor when increasing wages for its low-wage workers above the market rate. The House of Lords held that, despite the local authority's desire to better the workers' conditions, it had had no regard to the interests of ratepayers (a relevant factor) when coming to its decision.
Answer
?
Tags
#illegality #judicial-review #public
Question
In [case], a local authority had failed to consider a relevant factor when increasing wages for its low-wage workers above the market rate. The House of Lords held that, despite the local authority's desire to better the workers' conditions, it had had no regard to the interests of ratepayers (a relevant factor) when coming to its decision.
Answer
Roberts v Hopwood [1925] AC 578
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Roberts v Hopwood [1925] AC 578, a local authority had failed to consider a relevant factor when increasing wages for its low-wage workers above the market rate. The House of Lords held that, despite the local autho
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.