in R (Luton BC, Nottingham CC, Waltham Forest LBC, Newham LBC, Kent CC and Sandwell MBC) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin), the Secretary of State for Education (in July 2010) cancelled funding for the project 'Building Schools for the Future'. The court found that [...]. Instead, rules had been applied in a rigid way and the Secretary of State was asked by the court to reconsider the position of each of the claimants with an 'open mind'.
Answer
while the Secretary of State was entitled to adopt rules, each individual project should have been considered on its own merits, after careful consultation with each of the claimants
Tags
#illegality #judicial-review #public
Question
in R (Luton BC, Nottingham CC, Waltham Forest LBC, Newham LBC, Kent CC and Sandwell MBC) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin), the Secretary of State for Education (in July 2010) cancelled funding for the project 'Building Schools for the Future'. The court found that [...]. Instead, rules had been applied in a rigid way and the Secretary of State was asked by the court to reconsider the position of each of the claimants with an 'open mind'.
Answer
?
Tags
#illegality #judicial-review #public
Question
in R (Luton BC, Nottingham CC, Waltham Forest LBC, Newham LBC, Kent CC and Sandwell MBC) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin), the Secretary of State for Education (in July 2010) cancelled funding for the project 'Building Schools for the Future'. The court found that [...]. Instead, rules had been applied in a rigid way and the Secretary of State was asked by the court to reconsider the position of each of the claimants with an 'open mind'.
Answer
while the Secretary of State was entitled to adopt rules, each individual project should have been considered on its own merits, after careful consultation with each of the claimants
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Newham LBC, Kent CC and Sandwell MBC) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin), the Secretary of State for Education (in July 2010) cancelled funding for the project 'Building Schools for the Future'. The court found that <span>while the Secretary of State was entitled to adopt rules, each individual project should have been considered on its own merits, after careful consultation with each of the claimants. Instead, rules had been applied in a rigid way and the Secretary of State was asked by the court to reconsider the position of each of the claimants with an 'open mind'.</span
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.