Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#illegality #judicial-review #public
Question
in R (Luton BC, Nottingham CC, Waltham Forest LBC, Newham LBC, Kent CC and Sandwell MBC) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin), the Secretary of State for Education (in July 2010) cancelled funding for the project 'Building Schools for the Future'. The court found that [...]. Instead, rules had been applied in a rigid way and the Secretary of State was asked by the court to reconsider the position of each of the claimants with an 'open mind'.
Answer
while the Secretary of State was entitled to adopt rules, each individual project should have been considered on its own merits, after careful consultation with each of the claimants

Tags
#illegality #judicial-review #public
Question
in R (Luton BC, Nottingham CC, Waltham Forest LBC, Newham LBC, Kent CC and Sandwell MBC) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin), the Secretary of State for Education (in July 2010) cancelled funding for the project 'Building Schools for the Future'. The court found that [...]. Instead, rules had been applied in a rigid way and the Secretary of State was asked by the court to reconsider the position of each of the claimants with an 'open mind'.
Answer
?

Tags
#illegality #judicial-review #public
Question
in R (Luton BC, Nottingham CC, Waltham Forest LBC, Newham LBC, Kent CC and Sandwell MBC) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin), the Secretary of State for Education (in July 2010) cancelled funding for the project 'Building Schools for the Future'. The court found that [...]. Instead, rules had been applied in a rigid way and the Secretary of State was asked by the court to reconsider the position of each of the claimants with an 'open mind'.
Answer
while the Secretary of State was entitled to adopt rules, each individual project should have been considered on its own merits, after careful consultation with each of the claimants
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
Newham LBC, Kent CC and Sandwell MBC) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin), the Secretary of State for Education (in July 2010) cancelled funding for the project 'Building Schools for the Future'. The court found that <span>while the Secretary of State was entitled to adopt rules, each individual project should have been considered on its own merits, after careful consultation with each of the claimants. Instead, rules had been applied in a rigid way and the Secretary of State was asked by the court to reconsider the position of each of the claimants with an 'open mind'.</span

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.